@types/tedious C
How well maintained is @types/tedious? Automated heuristic grade from public registry data. Version 18.0.0 · score 65/100 · graded 2026-07-14 (refreshed on deploy)
| Deduction | Factor | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| −25 | deprecation | npm deprecated: This is a stub types definition. tedious provides its own type definitions, so you do not need this installed. |
| −4 | staleness | last publish 18 months ago |
| −3 | release_cadence | only 1 publish in trailing 24 months |
| −3 | maintainer_count | single maintainer (bus factor) |
Noticeable risk signals. Consider checking for actively maintained alternatives in this space before adding it to new projects.
Run your repo through DepGrade for a free letter grade and README badge, no signup.
DepGrade scores are automated heuristics computed from public data (npm registry, GitHub, OSV.dev). They are provided "as is", without warranty of any kind, and are not security advice, an audit, or a guarantee that a package is safe or unsafe. A good grade doesn't mean a package is free of vulnerabilities; a poor grade doesn't mean it's compromised. Always do your own review before making dependency decisions. DepGrade accepts no liability for decisions made based on these scores.